Updated Negative List Released on On September, 24

On September 8, 2024, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce released the “Special Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment Access (Negative List) (2024 Version)”, which will take effect from November 1, 2024.

According to the 2024 version of the “negative list”, the number of restrictive measures has been reduced from 31 to 29, removing restrictions such as “Printing of publications must be controlled by Chinese parties” and “Prohibition of investment in the application of traditional Chinese medicine processing techniques such as steaming, stir-frying, roasting, and calcining, as well as the production of TCM products with confidential prescriptions.” With this, foreign investment restrictions in the manufacturing sector have been completely lifted.

On the same day, the National Health and Family Planning Commission and the Ministry of Commerce jointly issued the “Notice on Carrying Out Pilot Work for Establishing Wholly Foreign-Owned Hospitals,” proposing to expand openness in the medical field through pilot programs. Specifically, it proposes allowing the establishment of wholly foreign-owned hospitals (excluding traditional Chinese medicine hospitals, and not including the acquisition of public hospitals) in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Nanjing, Suzhou, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hainan Province. Detailed conditions, requirements, and procedures for setting up wholly foreign-owned hospitals will be notified separately.

In the biotechnology field, foreign-invested enterprises in free trade test zones in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong, as well as in the Hainan Free Trade Port, are permitted to engage in the development and application of human stem cell technology, gene diagnosis, and therapeutic technologies for product registration, marketing, and production.

According to the notice, overseas investors can set up or acquire wholly foreign-owned hospitals in the above-mentioned areas. Except for investors from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, other overseas investors are not allowed to establish traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in these provinces (municipalities).

The notice requires that proposed wholly foreign-owned hospitals must meet the basic standards established by the state; the approval authority for setting up wholly foreign-owned hospitals is delegated to the provincial level.

Additionally, the establishment and changes of wholly foreign-owned hospitals should follow the procedures and requirements stipulated by the “Regulations on the Administration of Medical Institutions”, the “Detailed Rules for Implementation of the Regulations on the Administration of Medical Institutions”, and the “Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment in the Commercial Sector”.

In fact, China currently has some wholly foreign-owned medical institutions, but allowing foreign capital to participate in the development of cutting-edge biomedical technologies is unprecedented.

Analysts believe that the current national negative list now only has 29 items, narrowing the gap with the free trade zone version, which has 27 items, indicating that the national version is moving closer to the free trade zone version, while the free trade zone version is extending further into the opening of service industry investment.

With China’s aging population and the growth of an absolutely wealthy demographic, a blue ocean market for high-end medical services has emerged. Coupled with the relatively weak competitiveness of the domestic medical industry, there is significant appeal for foreign investment.

Updated Average Salary & Related Provisions

Average Salary is typically calculated by the National Bureau of Statistics or local statistical bureaus based on a certain statistical caliber. Average salary generally refers to the total salaries of employees over a certain period divided by the number of employees.

According to the requirements of laws and regulations such as the Statistics Law of the People’s Republic of China, the National Bureau of Statistics publishes the average salary of non-private unit employees and private unit employees in urban areas annually (previous year). Provincial and municipal governments also publish local average salary levels, and these data are usually made public on official government websites.

According to relevant laws, average salaey data can be used to:

1. adjust the minimum wage standards, serving as a reference basis for the upper and lower limits of social insurance contribution bases.

2. being used for the calculation of social security benefits, such as the calculation of basic pension and the distribution of unemployment benefits.

3. serve as an important indicator for measuring the income level of residents, providing a basis for the government to formulate relevant policies.

Recently, related authority released the average local salary for 2023 ( please be noted that, the updated data in always from the previous year) in the website: (Unit: Yuan)

Related provisions in Social Insurance Law of the People’s Republic of China(中华人民共和国社会保险法)

Article 15:

…The basic pension is determined

based on the individual’s cumulative contribution years, contribution salary, average salary of local employees, personal account amount, average life expectancy of the urban population and other factors.

( For more information, please check our previous post: More on Social Insurance)

Article 56:

…Maternity allowance shall be calculated and paid according to the average monthly salary of the employee in the previous year of the employer to which the employee belongs.

(For more information, please check our previous post: Female employee rights in China)

Child Custody & Spousal Property Inheritance in China

David has been living in China with his Chinese wife more than 10 years, after their marriage. The couple runs a business together, owns a house, and has a seven-year-old son. During a recent family trip, they were involved in a serious traffic accident. Although no one was injured, David began to seriously consider two questions:

  1. If both of us have accidents, who will take care of our child?
  2. If one of us dies, can the surviving spouse inherit all the property?

In fact, the two questions David is considering are also two important issues in family law: the issue of child custody and the issue of spousal property inheritance. Here, we share the conversation between David and his lawyer to help better understand the relevant laws.

Q: If both parents die, who will get custody of the child?

A: When both parents die and the child is a minor, grandparents on both sides have the qualifications to be guardians. However, who is the most suitable guardian should be viewed from the principle that is most beneficial to the ward. If one party has a better economic foundation and educational ability, or if both parties have similar economic conditions, then it depends on who the child has lived with or had more contact with previously.

Q: If one spouse dies, can the surviving spouse inherit all the family property?

A: No, the deceased spouse’s parents, spouse, and children are all the first-tier heirs and they all have to participate in the distribution of the deceased spouse’s property.

Q: Well, the property is all for the child in the future, no problem. However, do the deceased spouse’s parents also have to participate in the property distribution?

A: Yes, all first-tier heirs can participate in the property distribution equally.

Q: Our current house is under my wife’s name. You told me earlier that even if the house is only in my wife’s name, this house is jointly owned by the spouses, and indeed this house was purchased with contributions from both of us. Since my salary is higher, I actually contributed more to this house. However, you are now telling me that this house cannot be fully obtained by me and the child? Does that mean we can’t continue to live in it?

A: First, according to the law, the house purchased during the marriage is joint property of the spouses, regardless of whose name it is under;

Second, the house purchased during the marriage is joint property of the spouses, regardless of who contributed more, even if the other party has no income at all, it is still joint property of the spouses.( You may check our previous post for more info: Personal Assets or Family Assets, Can You Tell?)

Then, if one party dies, how should the house be handled?

Firstly, the house needs to be divided, that is, 50% of the house is the personal property of the deceased, and this 50% needs to be allocated by all first-tier heirs.

Q: Hmmm, the grandparents probably wouldn’t want to inherit, right? After all, they hope their grandson can live better, right?

A: This is a difficult question to generalize. Moreover, sometimes, even if the grandparents are not interested in the property, their children sometimes do not want their parents to give up any property they can get.

Q: This is really unexpected… Does it mean I can’t continue to live in the house where we have always lived with our child?

A: I have just explained all the legal provisions, that is to say, if there is no will, the inheritance will be conducted according to the legal provisions; but if the spouses leave a will, whether it is the issue of child custody or property inheritance, it will be resolved according to the contents of the will.

Q: It seems it’s time to seriously consider the issue of a will.

A: Yes, the couple should definitely discuss it thoroughly.

You get it now? If you are considering the issue seriously, you may contact us any time.

Relevant provisions in Civil Code of the PRC:

Article 27: …If the parents of a minor have died or are unable to exercise guardianship, the following persons with guardianship capacity shall assume the guardianship in the following order:

(1) Grandparents, maternal grandparents;

(2) Elder brothers, elder sisters;

(3) Other individuals or organizations willing to serve as guardians, but with the consent of the residents’ committee, villagers’ committee, or civil affairs department of the minor’s place of residence.

Article 1133: Natural persons may make a will in accordance with the provisions of this law to dispose of their personal property and may designate an executor of the will.

Should the Hotel be responsible for the Adult Tumble?

More than often, injuries sustained within business premises raise the question of whether the operator or the injured party bears responsibility. The best way to understand the spirit of the law is through case examples. Let’s see the following case:

In June 2022, Plaintiff Li claimed that while staying at the Defendant’s hotel, he slipped and fell in the bathroom the following morning,  incurring medical expenses of 46,000 yuan, and missing work for 14 days. Failing to reach a settlement with the hotel, Li sued, seeking compensation totaling 72,000 yuan.

The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant failed to lay down water barriers in the bathing area, causing the floor to be slippery, and only provided guests with fabric indoor slippers instead of plastic anti-slip ones. Consequently, the Defendant did not fulfill its security and safety obligations and should bear corresponding liability for the damages.

The Defendant countered by stating that there was no slippery condition within the room and had affixed a warning sign reading “Caution: Slippery Floor” in the bathroom where the Plaintiff fell, along with placing a bath mat at the entrance. The Defendant argued that the Plaintiff’s fall was due to his own actions and, as such, the hotel had already waived the lodging fee for Plaintiff.

The court held that according to Article 1198 of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, operators or managers of commercial venues like hotels, malls, banks, stations, airports, sports stadiums, entertainment venues, or organizers of mass activities shall assume tort liability if they fail to fulfill their duty of ensuring safety and cause harm to others.

As a business establishment, the hotel has an obligation to ensure the safety of individuals and property within its premises, commonly known as the ‘duty of care.’ However, this duty is subject to certain limitations.

In this case, the room occupied by the Plaintiff was a relatively enclosed private space, and the incident occurred more than ten hours after his check-in. The Plaintiff failed to provide evidence demonstrating that the floor was indeed slippery when he entered the bathroom early in the morning and could not pinpoint the exact cause of his fall. Given that the Plaintiff, as an adult, should have exercised primary caution in ensuring his safety within the private space, coupled with other factors such as the use of smooth ceramic tiles on the hotel’s floors, the court decided that the Defendant should bear 20% of the liability for Plaintiff’s injuries.

You get the spirit of the law now?

My Ex-employer Put Me on Blacklist, What Can I Do?

Working in China, one significant concern for expatriates is being placed on a blacklist, which would render them unable to apply for work permits or potentially green cards in the future.

China operates a nationwide work permit application system. Should a foreigner appear on the blacklist, when they attempt to renew or transfer their work permits, the system flags the application to government officials, who immediately reject it.

But who has the authority to place a foreigner on the blacklist? Only competent authorities like the Public Security Bureau (PSB) or the Bureau of Foreign Experts Affairs (BFEA) hold such power. Regular companies, schools, or agent firms do not have this authority.

Despite this, some employers or agents might falsely threaten foreign workers with blacklisting, claiming that they’ll make it impossible for them to secure employment elsewhere if they’re deemed “uncooperative,” such as when the employee wishes to terminate their association. However, these threats are baseless. As long as a foreigner is legally employed and adheres to Chinese laws and regulations, they cannot be arbitrarily blacklisted.

An unusual case surfaced where an online recruitment company maintained a self-made blacklist on their website. When teachers decided to part ways with the company or declined their offers, the company listed these individuals along with personal details and derogatory remarks, advising others to avoid them.

While this “homemade” blacklist is unofficial and does not impact the ability to find new jobs officially, it poses serious issues:

  1. It publicly disclosed teachers’ personal information.
  2. It fabricated stories to tarnish the reputations of these teachers.

Here, two types of torts were committed: #1 constitutes an invasion of privacy, while #2 amounts to defamation. Thus, the so-called “blacklist” represents a severe civil offense.

As more foreigners became aware of this issue, they collectively took action by contacting their embassies and informing the recruiting company’s business partners about the problem. Under mounting pressure, the company ultimately removed the blacklist from their website. Had someone obtained notarized evidence of the blacklist, they could have filed a lawsuit against the company and likely won, as China is actively improving its legal framework to better protect privacy rights.

  1. No one can blacklist you unless they are a competent authority; know your rights and assert them confidently.
  2. If anyone improperly discloses your personal details publicly, you can sue them based on the violation of your privacy rights.
  3. Individuals who defame others will face consequences for their actions.

Relevant provisions in The Civil Code of the PRC:

Article 1024: Civil subjects enjoy the right to reputation. No organization or individual may infringe upon another person’s right to reputation through means such as insult or defamation.

Article 1032: Natural persons enjoy the right to privacy. No organization or individual may infringe upon another person’s right to privacy by means such as prying, disturbance, disclosure, or publication.

The Vehicle Owner Should Be Responsible for Traffic Accident?Understanding Principle of No-fault Liability

On a rainy day, Mr. Wang lost control of his minibus causing it to overturn and collide with Mr. Liu, who was busy covering his truck with a rain tarp. This resulted in injuries to Mr. Liu. After failing to reach a settlement regarding compensation, Mr. Liu brought the matter to the first-instance court.

Mr. Liu argued that, despite the traffic accident being confirmed by the police as an unforeseen incident, the injuries he sustained were directly caused by the rupture of the right rear tire of Mr. Wang’s minibus leading to the overturn and collision. Therefore, Mr. Wang should assume corresponding economic liability for the damages incurred due to Mr. Liu’s injuries.

Mr. Wang countered that the accident was indeed an unforeseen incident and that he bore no fault in its occurrence.

The first-instance court, after examining the case, held that in accidents happened between motor vehicles and non-motorized vehicles/pedestrians, the motor vehicle party assumes no-fault liability. Although the police concluded that both parties were faultless in this accidental occurrence, the causal relationship between Mr. Liu’s injuries and Mr. Wang’s vehicular impact was evident, and there was no evidence indicating that Mr. Liu was at fault. Consequently, the owner/driver, Mr. Wang, was ordered to bear full compensation responsibility.

Unsatisfied with the result, Mr. Wang appealed, but the second-instance court upheld the ruling of the first-instance court, which applied the principle of no-fault liability.

Case analysis:

Article 1165 of the Civil Code of the PRC provides: Where a person causes harm to another’s civil rights due to a wrongful act, they shall bear tortious liability. This embodies the general principle of liability in civil torts: the principle of fault.

In contrast, the principle of no-fault liability dictates that under specific circumstances stipulated by law, a person who has not acted wrongfully shall still bear civil liability based on the resulting harm. The conditions for applying this principle are:

 (1) a clearly defined scope of application by law;

(2) disregard of the subjective fault of the infringing party;

(3) existence of statutory exemptions; and

(4) presence of causality.

Then, why was the principle of no-fault liability applied in this case?

Firstly, for non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians, motor vehicles represent high-speed moving tools that inherently carry a significantly higher risk factor. Thus, drivers of motor vehicles should be held to a heightened standard of cautious driving and safety awareness.

Secondly, according to the theory of benefit-based liability, i.e., ‘whoever enjoys the benefits bears the risks’, the owner of a vehicle, as the beneficiary of its operation, should naturally assume the risks associated with it, beneficiaries must pay the price for their gains, ensuring that those pursuing their interests simultaneously shoulder the risks inherent to those gains.

This aligns with economic rationality and the principles of fairness and reasonableness in civil law. Otherwise, it would be egregiously unfair if a pedestrian, who is faultless, were to bear the risks stemming from the actions of a motor vehicle operator. Modern legal systems typically prioritize protecting the weaker party in conflicts between two rights holders.

Generally, the provisions of the Tort Liability Chapter in the Civil Code show that the principle of no-fault liability mainly applies to the following scenarios: * liability of guardians for harm caused by minors under their supervision;

* employer liability for harm caused by employees;

* producer liability for product defects resulting in harm;

* motor vehicle owners’ liability for harm caused to non-motorized vehicles or pedestrians in traffic accidents;

* liability for environmental pollution and ecological damage causing harm;

* liability for harm caused by high-risk activities or facilities;

*and liability for harm caused by non-zoo kept animals.

Now, do you understand why the principle of no-fault liability was applied in this case?

Severance Payment for Termination of Employment in China

According to the provisions of the Labor Contract Law of PRC, employers are required to pay compensation to employees under the following situations:

(1) In situations specified in Article 38, Section 1 of the Labor Contract Law, where the employee terminates the labor contract, the employer shall pay compensation: I

1.The employer fails to provide labor protection or working conditions as agreed in the labor contract.

2.The employer fails to pay labor remuneration in a timely and full manner.

3.The employer fails to lawfully contribute to social insurance premiums for the employee.

4.The employer’s rules and regulations violate laws and regulations, causing harm to the rights of the employee.

5.The employer uses deception, coercion, or takes advantage of the employee’s vulnerability to enter into or modify the labor contract against the true intent, rendering the contract invalid.    

6.The employer exempts itself from legal responsibilities or excludes the rights of the employee, rendering the labor contract invalid.

7.The employer enters into a labor contract in violation of mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, rendering the contract invalid.

8.The employer uses violence, threats, or illegal restrictions on personal freedom to force labor.

9.The employer issues illegal commands, forces risky operations, and endangers the personal safety of the employee.

10.Payment of wages to employees below the local minimum wage standards. (Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases, Article 15)

(2) When the employer terminates the labor contract, compensation shall be paid to the employee:

1.As stipulated in Article 36 of the Labor Contract Law, the employer proposes and both parties negotiate the termination of the labor contract.    

2.In situations specified in Article 40 of the Labor Contract Law, where the employer terminates the labor contract:

a) The employee is sick or non-work-related injured, unable to engage in the original work after the prescribed medical period, and cannot be reassigned by the employer.

b) The employee is incapable of performing the work, even after training or adjusting the job position.

c) The objective circumstances on which the labor contract was based have undergone significant changes, making it impossible to perform the contract. After negotiation between the employer and the employee, no agreement is reached on changing the content of the labor contract.

3.In situations specified in Article 41, Section 1 of the Labor Contract Law:

a) The employer undergoes reorganization according to the regulations on enterprise bankruptcy, leading to personnel reductions.

b) The employer faces serious difficulties in production and operation, leading to personnel reductions.

c) The enterprise undergoes restructuring, major technological innovation, or business adjustment, requiring personnel reductions.    

d) Other significant changes in objective economic conditions relied upon at the time of concluding the labor contract, making the labor contract impossible to perform.

(3) When terminating the labor contract, compensation shall be paid to the employee (as specified in Article 44 of the Labor Contract Law):

1.The labor contract expires, and the employer terminates the fixed-term labor contract because the employee agrees to renew it but the employer does not.

2.The labor contract is terminated because the employer is legally declared bankrupt.

3.The labor contract is terminated because the employer’s business license is revoked, ordered to close, revoked, or the employer decides to dissolve in advance.

In addition, the determination of the wage in the severance payment  is specified in Article 47 of the Labor Contract Law. After the termination or rescission of the labor contract, the employer should pay compensation to the employee based on the employee’s years of service in the company, one month’s salary for each full year of service.    

For service periods of more than six months but less than one year, it is calculated as one year; and for periods of less than six months, half a month’s salary is paid as economic compensation.

The “wage” in the Labor Contract Law refers to the labor remuneration directly paid to the employee by the employer in monetary form, based on relevant national regulations or the agreement in the labor contract.

This generally includes hourly wages, piece-rate wages, bonuses, allowances, subsidies, and overtime pay, as well as wages paid under special circumstances. In practice, an employee’s wages typically consist of basic wages, payable wages, and actual wages. Basic wages are usually the minimum salary set by the employer for the employee, generally excluding overtime pay, allowances, subsidies, and welfare benefits. Payable wages refer to the total wages that the employee is entitled to according to legal regulations, including basic wages, overtime pay, bonuses, and allowances. Actual wages are the amount the employee actually receives each month, usually reduced by some expenses such as social insurance contributions, income tax, meal fees, and rent. The calculation compensation should be based on the employee’s payable wages, not basic wages or actual wages.    

The Implementation Regulations of the Labor Contract Law, Article 27, stipulate that the monthly wage for economic compensation under Article 47 of the Labor Contract Law is calculated based on the employee’s entitled wages, including monetary income such as hourly wages or piece-rate wages, as well as bonuses, allowances, and subsidies.

If the employee’s average wage in the 12 months before the termination or rescission of the labor contract is lower than the local minimum wage standard, it should be calculated based on the local minimum wage standard. For employees who have worked for less than 12 months, the average wage should be calculated based on the actual number of months worked.   

What to Do if You Buy a Refurbished Phone on Taobao?

On April 2nd of last year, Alex purchased an iPhone 5 from a Taobao store for the price of 2979.63 yuan. Upon receiving the phone, he found that the information registered for this phone through its serial number did not match the information provided by the seller on Taobao.

On April 15th, he requested a refund from the seller citing discrepancies in the registered information, but the request was denied. The seller insisted that Alex must return the phone first. On the same day, Alex applied for Taobao’s intervention, but the seller continued to refuse a refund without the return of the phone.

On April 22nd, after Taobao intervened, it was determined that Alex needed to return the phone for a refund. However, Alex disagreed. He sent the phone to China Inspection and Certification Group Beijing Co., Ltd. (referred to as Zhongjian Company) for inspection. He requested Taobao and the seller to wait for the inspection report before proceeding with the legal refund process.

On April 29th, Taobao’s trading system automatically closed the refund system due to the buyer exceeding the return deadline, and the payment of 2979.63 yuan in the system was transferred to the seller.

On May 6th, Zhongjian Company completed the inspection and issued a report confirming that the inspected phone was a refurbished device. At this point, Alex’s payment had already been transferred to the seller’s account. Therefore, based on the inspection report, Alex again requested Taobao’s intervention, asking the seller to comply with the new Consumer Rights Law and provide a threefold refund. However, the seller still insisted that Alex must return the product before receiving a refund.

Taobao claimed that, despite the evidence provided by Alex, they supported his request for a return and refund. However, due to the seller’s lack of cooperation in after-sales service, Taobao could not recover the losses for Alex. Therefore, Taobao could only impose a penalty on the seller’s account for “misrepresentation.”

Frustrated, Alex had no choice but to file a lawsuit against Taobao, seeking triple compensation. The court found that although Taobao took some measures after learning that Alex had purchased a refurbished device, these measures were insufficient to protect the rights of the victimized consumer, Alex.    

Regarding Alex’s demand for Taobao to pay triple compensation, the court ruled that the seller’s deposit on Taobao did not reach the amount of triple compensation requested by Alex. Therefore, the court did not support Alex’s request for Taobao to pay triple punitive damages.

Article 44 of the Consumer Rights Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulates that the liability of network trading platform providers (like Taobao )to consumers is limited to three situations:

1. If they cannot provide the true name, address, and valid contact information of the seller or service provider, consumers can demand compensation from the platform provider;

2. If the platform provider makes promises that are more favorable to consumers, they must fulfill those promises;

3. If the platform provider knowingly or should have known that the seller or service provider is using its platform to infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and fails to take necessary measures, they shall bear joint and several liability with the seller or service provider.

In this case, Alex purchased a counterfeit phone, and Taobao’s requirement for him to return the counterfeit product before refunding it constitutes an unreasonable and biased provision in favor of the seller. Taobao did not continue to withhold the payment under the circumstances, which constitutes a failure to take necessary measures and directly led to the consumer not receiving a refund. Therefore, it complies with Article 44, Paragraph 3 of the Consumer Rights Protection Law, and such a judgment in favor of Alex was made.